Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 4.6 GTexel / s vs 3.6 billion / sec
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 20 vs 16
- Around 57% better floating-point performance: 46 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 vs 156
- 11.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 24
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2143 vs 1791
- 6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 224
- 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 445
- 6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 224
- 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 445
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 September 2013 vs 17 April 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.6 GTexel / s vs 3.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 20 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 46 gflops vs 29.376 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 40 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 vs 156 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 vs 24 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 vs 1791 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 vs 224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 vs 445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 vs 224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 vs 445 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 459 MHz vs 350 MHz
| Core clock speed | 459 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 | 156 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 | 24 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 | 1791 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 | 224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 | 445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 | 224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 | 445 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Tesla |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | G86 |
| Launch date | 3 September 2013 | 17 April 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1421 | 1695 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $29.99 | |
| Price now | $39.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.68 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 459 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | 29.376 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.6 GTexel / s | 3.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR2 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 4400 with others
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7560D
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350G
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
AMDFirePro S4000X
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620M
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
NVIDIAGRID M40
