Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 65 nm
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 96 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 vs 477
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 44
- 16.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 vs 0.465
- 10.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 127
- 10.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 127
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 September 2013 vs 21 February 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 96 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 vs 477 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 vs 44 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 vs 0.465 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 vs 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 vs 127 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 20.8 billion / sec vs 4.6 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 64 vs 20
- 4.5x better floating-point performance: 208 gflops vs 46 gflops
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3161 vs 3044
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3161 vs 3044
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 20.8 billion / sec vs 4.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 64 vs 20 |
| Floating-point performance | 208 gflops vs 46 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3161 vs 3044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3161 vs 3044 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 | 477 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 | 44 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | 0.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 | 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 | 3161 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 | 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 | 3161 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Tesla |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | G94 |
| Launch date | 3 September 2013 | 21 February 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1421 | 1587 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Price now | $39.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | 208 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 64 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.6 GTexel / s | 20.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 96 Watt |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 4400 with others
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7560D
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350G
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
AMDFirePro S4000X
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620M
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
NVIDIAGRID M40
