Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 715 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 vs 432
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 126
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 vs 4.233
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.519
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.084 vs 7.151
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 2392
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M

• 4.8x more pipelines: 96 vs 20
• 5.5x better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 46 gflops
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.144 vs 154.696
• Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.605 vs 8.335
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1032 vs 817
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1595 vs 1381
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 vs 817
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1595 vs 1381

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	524 432
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	275 126
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2143 2141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.844 4.233
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	154.696 161.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.958 0.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.084 7.151
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.335 16.605
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 1032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1381 1595
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3044 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 1032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1381 1595
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3044 2392

Compare specifications (specs)