Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 49 Watt
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 vs 383
• Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 158
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 vs 1571
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 vs 4.046
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 vs 83.907
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 0.371
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.385 vs 6.791
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 vs 614
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 1162
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 1683
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 vs 614
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 1162
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 1683

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

• Around 75% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 11.2 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
• 4.8x more pipelines: 96 vs 20
• 5.4x better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 50 gflops
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.41 vs 12.361

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 383
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	314 158
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3210 1571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.844 4.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	171.17 83.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.115 0.371
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.385 6.791
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.361 17.41
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 1683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 1683

Compare specifications (specs)