Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 49 Watt
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 versus 383
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 158
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 versus 1571
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 versus 4.046
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 versus 83.907
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 versus 0.371
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.385 versus 6.791
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 versus 614
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 versus 1162
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 versus 1683
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 versus 614
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 versus 1162
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 versus 1683
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 15 May 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 49 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 versus 383 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 versus 158 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 versus 1571 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 versus 4.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 versus 83.907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 versus 0.371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 versus 6.791 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 versus 614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 versus 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 versus 1683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 versus 614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 versus 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 versus 1683 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Environ 75% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 11.2 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s
- 4.8x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 20
- 5.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 268.8 gflops versus 50 gflops
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.41 versus 12.361
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 400 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.2 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 268.8 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 versus 12.361 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 383 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 158 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 1571 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 4.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 83.907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 0.371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 6.791 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 17.41 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 1683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 1683 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1359 | 1554 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $39.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.32 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | 11.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 49 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | 585 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 4600 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GTX
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5650
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 305M
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 530 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M435DX
