Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA Tesla M2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 1.005
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 June 2013 vs 25 July 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 vs 1.005 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 574 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 6.4x more texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 22.4x more pipelines: 448 vs 20
- 20.6x better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 50 gflops
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.145 vs 8.844
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 910.236 vs 171.17
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.235 vs 10.385
- 7.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.442 vs 12.361
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 50 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.145 vs 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 vs 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 vs 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 vs 12.361 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 628 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3212 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 12.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 910.236 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 1.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 46.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 94.442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | GF100 |
Launch date | 3 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1358 | 1359 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,099 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 574 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |