Intel HD Graphics 500 vs Intel HD Graphics 5000

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 500 and Intel HD Graphics 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 500

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 30 Watt

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000

• Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz
• 3.3x more pipelines: 40 vs 12
• Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 587 vs 300
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 vs 80
• 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3134 vs 911
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.563 vs 3.525
• 13.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 vs 35.665
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 713 vs 488
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1103 vs 579
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1713 vs 1122
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 713 vs 488
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1103 vs 579
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1713 vs 1122

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 500
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	300 587
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	80 221
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	911 3134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.525 9.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.665 490.588
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	488 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	579 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1122 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	488 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	579 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1122 1713

Compare specifications (specs)