Intel HD Graphics 500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 500 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 500

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 19 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

• 4.8x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 200 MHz
• Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
• 16x more pipelines: 192 vs 12
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 144.0 gflops
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 300
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 80
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1946 vs 911
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.705 vs 3.525
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 100.391 vs 35.665
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.441 vs 0.215
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.146 vs 2.987
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 vs 4.154
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 977 vs 488
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 579
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 vs 1122
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 vs 488
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 579
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 vs 1122

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	300 623
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	80 212
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	911 1946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.525 6.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.665 100.391
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.215 0.441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.987 8.146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.154 20.64
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	488 977
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	579 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1122 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	488 977
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	579 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1122 1833

Compare specifications (specs)