Intel HD Graphics 5000 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5000 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 2.5x more pipelines: 40 vs 16
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 587 vs 347
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 vs 194
- 5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3134 vs 538
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.563 vs 8.712
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 vs 155.638
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 14 May 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Pipelines | 40 vs 16 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 587 vs 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 vs 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3134 vs 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.563 vs 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 vs 155.638 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 713
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1103
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1713
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 713
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1103
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1713
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 vs 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 vs 1713 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5000
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 587 | 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3134 | 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.563 | 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 | 155.638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 713 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1103 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1713 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 713 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1103 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1713 | 2392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 5000 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 14 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1388 | 1501 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | 16 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |