Intel HD Graphics 5000 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5000 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz
  • 2.5x more pipelines: 40 vs 16
  • Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 587 vs 347
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 vs 194
  • 5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3134 vs 538
  • Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.563 vs 8.712
  • 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 vs 155.638
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2013 vs 14 May 2012
Boost clock speed 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Pipelines 40 vs 16
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 587 vs 347
PassMark - G2D Mark 221 vs 194
Geekbench - OpenCL 3134 vs 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.563 vs 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 490.588 vs 155.638

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

  • 3.3x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 713
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1103
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1713
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 713
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1103
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1713
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 650 MHz vs 200 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 754 vs 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1492 vs 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2392 vs 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 754 vs 713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1492 vs 1103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2392 vs 1713

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5000
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
587
347
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
221
194
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3134
538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9.563
8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
490.588
155.638
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
713
754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1103
1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1713
2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
713
754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1103
1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1713
2392
Name Intel HD Graphics 5000 Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark 587 347
PassMark - G2D Mark 221 194
Geekbench - OpenCL 3134 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.563 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 490.588 155.638
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 713 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1103 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1713 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 713 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1103 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1713 2392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 12.009
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 5000 Intel HD Graphics 4000

Essentials

Architecture Generation 7.5 Generation 7.0
Code name Haswell GT3 Ivy Bridge GT2
Launch date 27 May 2013 14 May 2012
Place in performance rating 1388 1501
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 22 nm
Pipelines 40 16
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 1,300 million 1,200 million
Floating-point performance 33.6 gflops
Texture fill rate 4.2 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.3 4.0

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory 1 1

Technologies

Quick Sync