Intel HD Graphics 5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 587 vs 532
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 vs 152
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3134 vs 2387
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.563 vs 5.055
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 490.588 vs 215.004
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 22 March 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 587 vs 532 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 vs 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3134 vs 2387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.563 vs 5.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 vs 215.004 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- 2.4x more pipelines: 96 vs 40
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 967 vs 713
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 vs 1103
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1713
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 967 vs 713
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 vs 1103
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1713
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 96 vs 40 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1713 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 587 | 532 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3134 | 2387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.563 | 5.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 | 215.004 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 713 | 967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1103 | 2766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1713 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 713 | 967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1103 | 2766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1713 | 3359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi |
Code name | Haswell GT3 | GF108 |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1388 | 1390 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |