Intel HD Graphics 5000 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5000 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1180 vs 587
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 390 vs 221
- Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5083 vs 3134
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2095 vs 713
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3285 vs 1103
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2095 vs 713
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3285 vs 1103
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1180 vs 587 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 vs 221 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5083 vs 3134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2095 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2095 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 vs 1103 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5000
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 587 | 1180 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | 390 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3134 | 5083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.563 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 713 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1103 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 713 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1103 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1713 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 5000 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Haswell GT3 | Haswell GT3e |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1388 | 661 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | 40 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 392 million |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 10.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Memory type | eDRAM | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |