Intel HD Graphics 510 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 510
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 32 Watt
- 64x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 512 MB
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.381 versus 6.577
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.081 versus 0.559
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.094 versus 12.554
- 31.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 902 versus 28.9
- 27.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1333 versus 48.1
- 17.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1786 versus 99.8
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 3 February 2013 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 32 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 512 MB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.381 versus 6.577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.081 versus 0.559 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.094 versus 12.554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 902 versus 28.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 versus 48.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 versus 99.8 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 745 MHz versus 300 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 23.84 GTexel / s versus 11.4 GTexel / s
- 32x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 12
- 3.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 572.2 gflops versus 182.4 gflops
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 226.218 versus 215.873
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.947 versus 11.675
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1706 versus 902
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2983 versus 1333
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5586 versus 1786
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 745 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.84 GTexel / s versus 11.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 12 |
| Performance á point flottant | 572.2 gflops versus 182.4 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 226.218 versus 215.873 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.947 versus 11.675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1706 versus 902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2983 versus 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5586 versus 1786 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 510 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 621 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2381 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.381 | 6.577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.873 | 226.218 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.081 | 0.559 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.675 | 11.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.094 | 12.554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 902 | 1706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1333 | 2983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1786 | 5586 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 902 | 28.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 | 48.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 | 99.8 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 510 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT1 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 3 February 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1509 | 1512 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 182.4 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.4 GTexel / s | 23.84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 512 MB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 40 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 510 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 510 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GS
IntelHD Graphics 510 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GS
IntelHD Graphics 510 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 610i
IntelHD Graphics 510 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
IntelHD Graphics 510 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800M
IntelHD Graphics 510 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
