Intel HD Graphics 510 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 510
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 64x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 512 MB
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.381 versus 11.245
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.081 versus 0.785
- 28.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 902 versus 31.3
- 30.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1333 versus 43.4
- 19.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1786 versus 91.5
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 512 MB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.381 versus 11.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.081 versus 0.785 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 902 versus 31.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 versus 43.4 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 versus 91.5 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
- 3.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 950 MHz versus 300 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 30.4 GTexel / s versus 11.4 GTexel / s
- 32x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 12
- 4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 729.6 gflops versus 182.4 gflops
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 301.554 versus 215.873
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.08 versus 11.675
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.56 versus 15.094
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1848 versus 902
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2690 versus 1333
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5125 versus 1786
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.4 GTexel / s versus 11.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 12 |
| Performance á point flottant | 729.6 gflops versus 182.4 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 301.554 versus 215.873 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.08 versus 11.675 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.56 versus 15.094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1848 versus 902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2690 versus 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5125 versus 1786 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 510 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 622 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2381 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.381 | 11.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.873 | 301.554 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.081 | 0.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.675 | 16.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.094 | 16.56 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 902 | 1848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1333 | 2690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1786 | 5125 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 902 | 31.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 | 43.4 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 | 91.5 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 510 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT1 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1502 | 1504 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 182.4 gflops | 729.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.4 GTexel / s | 30.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 512 MB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 510 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 510 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 420
IntelHD Graphics 510 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430
IntelHD Graphics 510 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 3000M
IntelHD Graphics 510 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M
IntelHD Graphics 510 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
IntelHD Graphics 510 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800M
