Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 668
• Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 vs 2262
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 5.698
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 vs 0.497
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 vs 9.27
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2716
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2716

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

• 2.3x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 238 vs 209
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 175.385 vs 143.083
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1064 vs 951
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1589 vs 1462
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1064 vs 951
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1589 vs 1462

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	864 668
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	209 238
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3993 2262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.852 5.698
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	143.083 175.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.243 0.497
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.958 9.27
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 2716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 2716

Compare specifications (specs)