Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce 910M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 910M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 588
• Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 113
• Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 vs 2629
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 6.448
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 vs 0.574
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 vs 12.2
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.182 vs 27.733
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 3020
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 3020

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M

• 2.6x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.993 vs 143.083
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1344 vs 951
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 1462
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1344 vs 951
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 1462

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 910M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	864 588
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	209 113
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3993 2629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.852 6.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	143.083 155.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.243 0.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.958 12.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.182 27.733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 3020
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 3020

Compare specifications (specs)