Intel HD Graphics 530 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and ATI Radeon HD 5750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 700 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 86 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
• 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 vs 1039
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 7.384
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 0.679
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 1757
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 1757

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750

• 2x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 30x more pipelines: 720 vs 24
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1168 vs 995
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 254
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 460.31 vs 330.464
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.118 vs 19.781
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.346 vs 30.177
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2124 vs 1045
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2124 vs 1045

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	995 1168
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	254 338
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 1039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.747 7.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	330.464 460.31
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.804 0.679
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.781 23.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.177 53.346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3347

Compare specifications (specs)