Intel HD Graphics 530 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 24.79 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 24.117
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 1.651
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3309
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3309

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

• 3x more core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 97% better floating-point performance: 793.3 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2135 vs 995
• Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 475 vs 254
• Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6108 vs 4397
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 vs 330.464
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 vs 19.781
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 vs 30.177
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 vs 1045
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 vs 1045
• Around 71% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 655 vs 384

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	995 2135
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	254 475
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 6108
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.747 24.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	330.464 335.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.804 1.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.781 27.096
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.177 97.126
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	384 655

Compare specifications (specs)