Intel HD Graphics 530 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 530
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.2 GTexel / s versus 24.79 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 versus 24.117
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 versus 1.651
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 3309
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 3309
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s versus 24.79 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 versus 24.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 versus 1.651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 versus 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 versus 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3309 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- 3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1033 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 97% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 793.3 gflops versus 403.2 gflops
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2135 versus 995
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 475 versus 254
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6108 versus 4397
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 versus 330.464
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 versus 19.781
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 versus 30.177
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 versus 1045
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 versus 1045
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 655 versus 384
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 793.3 gflops versus 403.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2135 versus 995 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 475 versus 254 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6108 versus 4397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 versus 330.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 versus 19.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 versus 30.177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 versus 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 versus 1045 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 versus 384 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | 2135 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 475 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | 6108 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | 24.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | 335.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | 1.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | 27.096 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | 97.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 | 655 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1248 | 979 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | 793.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | 24.79 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 530 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 4000
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon 620
