Intel HD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 3.9x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
• Around 97% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 204.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 vs 342
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 99
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.275 vs 4.721
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 227.879 vs 107.613
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.508 vs 0.445
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.582 vs 10.612
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.288 vs 13.097
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 701
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1733 vs 1338
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 1811
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 701
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1733 vs 1338
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 1811

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 5.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 24
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 4178

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	922 342
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	216 99
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4178 8386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.275 4.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	227.879 107.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.508 0.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.582 10.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.288 13.097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 1811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 1811

Compare specifications (specs)