Intel HD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R7 M440

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R7 M440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 vs 897
  • Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 170
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2537
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2537
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 August 2016 vs 15 May 2016
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 922 vs 897
PassMark - G2D Mark 216 vs 170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 2537
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 2537

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440

  • 3.4x more core clock speed: 1021 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
  • Around 62% better floating-point performance: 653.4 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
  • Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5598 vs 4178
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1935 vs 1404
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2067 vs 1733
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1935 vs 1404
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2067 vs 1733
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1021 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 320 vs 24
Floating-point performance 653.4 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5598 vs 4178
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1935 vs 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2067 vs 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1935 vs 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2067 vs 1733

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M440

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
922
897
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
216
170
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4178
5598
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1404
1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1733
2067
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
2537
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1404
1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1733
2067
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
2537
Name Intel HD Graphics 620 AMD Radeon R7 M440
PassMark - G3D Mark 922 897
PassMark - G2D Mark 216 170
Geekbench - OpenCL 4178 5598
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 227.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 30.288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1404 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1733 2067
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 2537
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1404 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1733 2067
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 2537
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 343

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 620 AMD Radeon R7 M440

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 3.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT2 Meso
Launch date 30 August 2016 15 May 2016
Place in performance rating 1334 1112
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1021 MHz
Floating-point performance 403.2 gflops 653.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 24 320
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel / s 20.42 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 DDR3
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 16 GB / s
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync