Intel HD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R7 M440
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R7 M440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 vs 897
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 170
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2537
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2537
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 15 May 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 vs 897 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 vs 170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2537 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1021 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
- Around 62% better floating-point performance: 653.4 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5598 vs 4178
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1935 vs 1404
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2067 vs 1733
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1935 vs 1404
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2067 vs 1733
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1021 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 653.4 gflops vs 403.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5598 vs 4178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2067 vs 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2067 vs 1733 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M440
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon R7 M440 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 | 897 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 | 170 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4178 | 5598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 | 2067 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 2537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 | 2067 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 2537 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon R7 M440 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Meso |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1334 | 1112 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1021 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 653.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 20.42 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |