Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Intel HD Graphics 6000
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and Intel HD Graphics 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 vs 875
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4178 vs 3519
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 1225
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1733 vs 1363
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3259
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 1225
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1733 vs 1363
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3259
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 5 September 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 vs 875 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4178 vs 3519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 vs 1225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 vs 1363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3259 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 vs 1225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 vs 1363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3259 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 6000
- 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 273 vs 216
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 48 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 273 vs 216 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 | 875 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 | 273 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4178 | 3519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 1225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 | 1363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3259 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 1225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 | 1363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3259 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 620 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Broadwell GT3 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 5 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1334 | 1126 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |