Intel HD Graphics 620 versus Intel HD Graphics 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 620 and Intel HD Graphics 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 versus 875
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4178 versus 3519
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 versus 1225
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1733 versus 1363
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 versus 3259
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 versus 1225
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1733 versus 1363
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 3259
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 5 September 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 versus 875 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4178 versus 3519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 versus 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 versus 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3259 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 6000
- 2x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 24
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 273 versus 216
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 48 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 273 versus 216 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 | 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4178 | 3519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3259 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 620 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 8.0 |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 5 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1334 | 1126 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce3 Ti500
IntelHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1300
IntelHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2400
IntelHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570D
IntelHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8450G
IntelHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550 OEM
