Intel HD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 94% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec
  • Around 30% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 311.04 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
  • Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 926 vs 771
  • Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4163 vs 2627
  • 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.275 vs 6.139
  • Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 227.879 vs 171.053
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.508 vs 0.646
  • Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.582 vs 9.729
  • Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.288 vs 19.965
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 1208
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3275
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 1208
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3275
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 August 2016 vs 1 February 2011
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec
Floating-point performance 403.2 gflops vs 311.04 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 926 vs 771
Geekbench - OpenCL 4163 vs 2627
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.275 vs 6.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 227.879 vs 171.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.508 vs 0.646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.582 vs 9.729
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 30.288 vs 19.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1404 vs 1208
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1404 vs 1208
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 3275

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440

  • 5.4x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 219
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2053 vs 1733
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2053 vs 1733
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1620 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 96 vs 24
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 230 vs 219
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2053 vs 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2053 vs 1733

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
926
771
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
219
230
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4163
2627
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
24.275
6.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
227.879
171.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.508
0.646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.582
9.729
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
30.288
19.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1404
1208
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1733
2053
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3275
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1404
1208
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1733
2053
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3275
Name Intel HD Graphics 620 NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
PassMark - G3D Mark 926 771
PassMark - G2D Mark 219 230
Geekbench - OpenCL 4163 2627
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.275 6.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 227.879 171.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.508 0.646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.582 9.729
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 30.288 19.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1404 1208
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1733 2053
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1404 1208
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1733 2053
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 3275
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 343

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 620 NVIDIA GeForce GT 440

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Fermi
Code name Kaby Lake GT2 GF108
Launch date 30 August 2016 1 February 2011
Place in performance rating 1327 1345
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $79
Price now $69.99
Value for money (0-100) 14.03

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1620 MHz
Floating-point performance 403.2 gflops 311.04 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 24 96
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel / s 13.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 585 million
CUDA cores 96
Maximum GPU temperature 98 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.2

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 DDR3
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5)
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
Standard memory config per GPU 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Vision
CUDA