Intel HD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 94% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec
- Around 30% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 311.04 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 926 vs 771
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4163 vs 2627
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.275 vs 6.139
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 227.879 vs 171.053
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.508 vs 0.646
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.582 vs 9.729
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.288 vs 19.965
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 1208
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3275
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 1208
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3275
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 1 February 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops vs 311.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 926 vs 771 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4163 vs 2627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 vs 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 vs 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 vs 0.646 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 vs 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 vs 19.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 vs 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 vs 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3275 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- 5.4x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 219
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2053 vs 1733
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2053 vs 1733
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 vs 219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 vs 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 vs 1733 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 926 | 771 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 | 230 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4163 | 2627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | 0.646 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | 19.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3275 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GF108 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 1 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1327 | 1345 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $69.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.03 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 311.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 13.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |