Intel HD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 7.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 116 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.275 vs 18.461
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.508 vs 1.125
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3322
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3322
• Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 343 vs 322

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

• 6x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
• Around 71% better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 vs 922
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 216
• Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5750 vs 4178
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.392 vs 227.879
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.511 vs 15.582
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 41.941 vs 30.288
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 vs 1404
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 1733
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 vs 1404
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 1733

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	922 1557
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	216 382
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4178 5750
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.275 18.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	227.879 354.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.508 1.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.582 18.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.288 41.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3322
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	343 322

Compare specifications (specs)