Intel HD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 44% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 280 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 5.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 78 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 925 vs 378
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 vs 84
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3285
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 8 January 2008 |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops vs 280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 78 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 925 vs 378 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 vs 84 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 112 vs 24
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 112 vs 24 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 925 | 378 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 | 84 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3285 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | G92 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 8 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1332 | 1329 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Price now | $99.02 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.26 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 78 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |