Intel HD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon HD 6550D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1111 vs 401
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 267 vs 131
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4591 vs 1354
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1859 vs 1382
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 3324
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1859 vs 1382
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 3324
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 30 June 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1111 vs 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 267 vs 131 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4591 vs 1354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 vs 1382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 vs 1382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 3324 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6550D
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 16.7x more pipelines: 400 vs 24
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1975 vs 1945
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1975 vs 1945
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 400 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1975 vs 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1975 vs 1945 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6550D
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon HD 6550D |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1111 | 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 267 | 131 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4591 | 1354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | 1382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 1975 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | 1382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 1975 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon HD 6550D | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Llano |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 30 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1242 | 1245 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 27.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1000 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |