AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs Intel HD Graphics 630
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9171 MCM and Intel HD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
- 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 924.953 vs 312.246
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.499 vs 1.795
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.632 vs 20.404
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.705 vs 32.567
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 October 2017 vs 30 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops vs 441.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 924.953 vs 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.499 vs 1.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.632 vs 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.705 vs 32.567 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 27.321
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 vs 27.321 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E9171 MCM | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.321 | 27.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 924.953 | 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.499 | 1.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.632 | 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.705 | 32.567 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1110 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 267 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4612 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9171 MCM | Intel HD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Lexa | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 3 October 2017 | 30 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1238 | 1240 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 27.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 |