AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs Intel HD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9171 MCM and Intel HD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 3.2x more core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz
  • Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
  • 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
  • 2.8x better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
  • 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 924.953 vs 312.246
  • Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.499 vs 1.795
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.632 vs 20.404
  • 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.705 vs 32.567
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 October 2017 vs 30 August 2016
Core clock speed 1124 MHz vs 350 MHz
Boost clock speed 1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Texture fill rate 39.01 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 512 vs 24
Floating-point performance 1,248 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 924.953 vs 312.246
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.499 vs 1.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 52.632 vs 20.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 97.705 vs 32.567

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

  • 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 27.321
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
Maximum memory size 64 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.948 vs 27.321

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27.321
27.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
924.953
312.246
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.499
1.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
52.632
20.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
97.705
32.567
Name AMD Radeon E9171 MCM Intel HD Graphics 630
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.321 27.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 924.953 312.246
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.499 1.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 52.632 20.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 97.705 32.567
PassMark - G3D Mark 1110
PassMark - G2D Mark 267
Geekbench - OpenCL 4590
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 388

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM Intel HD Graphics 630

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Generation 9.5
Code name Lexa Kaby Lake GT2
Launch date 3 October 2017 30 August 2016
Place in performance rating 1239 1241
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1219 MHz 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 1124 MHz 350 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,248 gflops 441.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 512 24
Texture fill rate 39.01 GTexel / s 27.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 2,200 million 189 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 GB
Memory bandwidth 96 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4
Shared memory 1