AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs Intel HD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9171 MCM and Intel HD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Intel HD Graphics 630

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
3.2x more core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 350 MHz
Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
2.8x better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 924.953 vs 312.246
Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.499 vs 1.795
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.632 vs 20.404
3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.705 vs 32.567

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 October 2017 vs 30 August 2016
Core clock speed	1124 MHz vs 350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 24
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	924.953 vs 312.246
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.499 vs 1.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	52.632 vs 20.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	97.705 vs 32.567

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 27.321

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 40 Watt
Maximum memory size	64 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.948 vs 27.321

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.321

27.948

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

924.953

312.246

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.499

1.795

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

52.632

20.404

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

97.705

32.567

Name	AMD Radeon E9171 MCM	Intel HD Graphics 630
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.321	27.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	924.953	312.246
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.499	1.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	52.632	20.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	97.705	32.567
PassMark - G3D Mark		1110
PassMark - G2D Mark		267
Geekbench - OpenCL		4612
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		388

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon E9171 MCM	Intel HD Graphics 630
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Generation 9.5
Code name	Lexa	Kaby Lake GT2
Launch date	3 October 2017	30 August 2016
Place in performance rating	1238	1240
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	1124 MHz	350 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	441.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	512	24
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s	27.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	64 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4
Shared memory		1