Intel HD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R9 M375

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R9 M375 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1015 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1110 vs 970
• Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 267 vs 162
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.246 vs 272.547
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 vs 1850
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 2112
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 vs 1850
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 2112

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375

• 2.9x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
• 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
• 2.9x better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10853 vs 4590
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.048 vs 27.948
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.024 vs 1.795
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.994 vs 20.404
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 142.872 vs 32.567
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2227 vs 1859
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2227 vs 1859

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M375

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1110 970
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	267 162
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4590 10853
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 29.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 272.547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 2.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 35.994
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 142.872
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 2112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 2112

Compare specifications (specs)