Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce 705M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce 705M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 4.7x more texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
• 3.1x better floating-point performance: 441.6 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1108 vs 456
• 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 4.569
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.246 vs 115.15
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 vs 0.373
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 vs 7.904
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 32.567 vs 11.055
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 vs 1131
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 1629
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 vs 1131
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 1629

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 705M

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
• Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 455 vs 267

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 705M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1108 456
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	267 455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 4.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 115.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 0.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 7.904
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 11.055
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 1131
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 1629
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 1131
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 1629

Compare specifications (specs)