Intel HD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R7 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1111 vs 898
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 13.344
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.246 vs 290.632
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 vs 1.262
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1859 vs 1688
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1859 vs 1688

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

• 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
• Around 13% better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 272 vs 268
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5292 vs 4582
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.59 vs 20.404
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.326 vs 32.567
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1945
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1945

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 240

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1111 898
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	268 272
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4582 5292
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 13.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 290.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 1.262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 21.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 60.326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 2342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 2342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3353

Compare specifications (specs)