Intel HD Graphics 630 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 6.6x more texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 24 vs 16
• 13.1x better floating-point performance: 441.6 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 vs 347
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 194
• 8.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4554 vs 538
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 8.712
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.246 vs 155.638
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 vs 0.931
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 vs 7.36
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 32.567 vs 12.009
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1859 vs 754
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 vs 1492
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 2392
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1859 vs 754
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 vs 1492
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• Around 86% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 350 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1114 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	268 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4554 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 2392

Compare specifications (specs)