Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 6.6x more texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 24 vs 16
- 11.2x better floating-point performance: 441.6 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
- 128x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 512 MB
- 8.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 vs 126
- 8.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 30
- Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4554 vs 2438
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 vs 497
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 688
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 vs 497
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 12 October 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 27.6 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 24 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30.5 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 vs 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 vs 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 vs 2438 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- 4x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 350 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | 2438 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 688 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 12 October 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1216 | 1674 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | |
| Price now | $32.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1402 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 27.6 GTexel / s | 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 260 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
| Length | 6.60" (16.8 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR2 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 8.0 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 630 with others
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon IGP 350M
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5200 Ultra
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9600 TX
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
