Intel HD Graphics P4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P4600 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 84 Watt vs 122 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 vs 436
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 vs 17 August 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 vs 436 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000
- 2x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 6.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3999 vs 605
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11455 vs 3372
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.318 vs 8.915
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 681.141 vs 146.479
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.062 vs 1.178
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.922 vs 10.689
- 10.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.311 vs 6.64
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3680 vs 3342
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3680 vs 3342
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3999 vs 605 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11455 vs 3372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.318 vs 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 681.141 vs 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.062 vs 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.922 vs 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.311 vs 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | 3999 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 | 436 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3372 | 11455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.915 | 31.318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.479 | 681.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.178 | 3.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.689 | 32.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.64 | 67.311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6288 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics P4600 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | GK104 |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 | 17 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 687 | 689 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Price now | $1,950 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.47 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 706 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt | 122 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 3,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,169 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1536 | |
Texture fill rate | 90.37 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 172.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |