Intel HD Graphics P4600 versus NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics P4600 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics P4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 45% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 84 Watt versus 122 Watt
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 versus 436
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 June 2013 versus 17 August 2012 |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt versus 122 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 versus 436 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5000
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 706 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 6.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3999 versus 605
- 3.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11455 versus 3372
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.318 versus 8.915
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 681.141 versus 146.479
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.062 versus 1.178
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.922 versus 10.689
- 10.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.311 versus 6.64
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3680 versus 3342
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3680 versus 3342
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 706 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3999 versus 605 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11455 versus 3372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.318 versus 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 681.141 versus 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.062 versus 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.922 versus 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.311 versus 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 versus 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 versus 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3345 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | 3999 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 | 436 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3372 | 11455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.915 | 31.318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.479 | 681.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.178 | 3.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.689 | 32.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.64 | 67.311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6288 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1351 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics P4600 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 1 June 2013 | 17 August 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 687 | 689 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Prix maintenant | $1,950 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 2.47 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 706 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt | 122 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 392 million | 3,540 million |
Performance á point flottant | 2,169 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1536 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 90.37 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 172.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |