Intel HD Graphics P630 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P630 and NVIDIA Quadro M3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Launch date | 5 August 2016 vs 18 August 2015 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 42.7x more pipelines: 1,024 vs 24
- 2.4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1740 MB
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5526 vs 1192
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 402 vs 298
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16049 vs 4959
- 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7779 vs 979
- 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7779 vs 979
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 2158
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 2158
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3049
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3049
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1,024 vs 24 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1740 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5526 vs 1192 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 vs 298 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16049 vs 4959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7779 vs 979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7779 vs 979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 2158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 2158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3049 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3049 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics P630 | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1192 | 5526 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 298 | 402 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4959 | 16049 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 979 | 7779 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 979 | 7779 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2158 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2158 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 | 3360 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 82.563 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.91 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.779 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.607 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics P630 | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 5 August 2016 | 18 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1018 | 495 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1,024 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 67.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics P630 with others
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4400
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
ATIFireGL X1-256
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
AMDRadeon E8860
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 3 Mobile
