Intel Arc A370M vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and AMD Radeon Pro W5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Arc A370M

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 1187 MHz
Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 7 nm
3.6x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 125 Watt
Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 167.171 vs 130.7

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 Mar 2022 vs 10 Feb 2020
Core clock speed	1550 MHz vs 1187 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Texture fill rate	131.2 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm vs 7 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 125 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	167.171 vs 130.7

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500

Around 38% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1024
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 vs 1470.844
Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 vs 10.937
Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 vs 71.258
Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 vs 482.549

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1408 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2361.73 vs 1470.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	13.641 vs 10.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	135.462 vs 71.258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	774.974 vs 482.549

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W5500

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

167.171

130.7

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1470.844

2361.73

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.937

13.641

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

71.258

135.462

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

482.549

774.974

Name	Intel Arc A370M	AMD Radeon Pro W5500
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	167.171	130.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1470.844	2361.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.937	13.641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	71.258	135.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	482.549	774.974
PassMark - G2D Mark	724
PassMark - G3D Mark	5115
Geekbench - OpenCL	29681
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		12184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3463
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		12184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3463
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3355

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Arc A370M	AMD Radeon Pro W5500
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 1.0
Code name	DG2-128	Navi 14
Launch date	30 Mar 2022	10 Feb 2020
Place in performance rating	336	333
Launch price (MSRP)		$399
Type		Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	1400 MHz
Core clock speed	1550 MHz	1187 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	7 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	1,050 GFLOPS (1:4)	246.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)	7.885 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.198 TFLOPS	3.942 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1408
Pixel fill rate	65.60 GPixel/s	44.80 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	131.2 GTexel/s	123.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	125 Watt
Transistor count	7200 million	6400 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	4x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length		267 mm (10.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU)		350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
Width		Single-slot
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.1
OpenCL	3.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	224 GB/s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective	1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6