Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Arc A370M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
2.6x more core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 600 MHz
Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1215 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
Around 71% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 60 Watt
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 337

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 Mar 2022 vs 27 May 2019
Core clock speed	1550 MHz vs 600 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 60 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	724 vs 337

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 175.0 GTexel/s vs 131.2 GTexel/s
2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.867 vs 167.171
Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2046.214 vs 1470.844
Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.026 vs 10.937
Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.532 vs 71.258
Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 645.647 vs 482.549
Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8351 vs 5115
2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 29681

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	175.0 GTexel/s vs 131.2 GTexel/s
Pipelines	2304 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	220.867 vs 167.171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2046.214 vs 1470.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.026 vs 10.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	94.532 vs 71.258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	645.647 vs 482.549
PassMark - G3D Mark	8351 vs 5115
Geekbench - OpenCL	68305 vs 29681

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

167.171

220.867

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1470.844

2046.214

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.937

16.026

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

71.258

94.532

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

482.549

645.647

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

724

337

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5115

8351

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

29681

68305

Name	Intel Arc A370M	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	167.171	220.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1470.844	2046.214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.937	16.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	71.258	94.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	482.549	645.647
PassMark - G2D Mark	724	337
PassMark - G3D Mark	5115	8351
Geekbench - OpenCL	29681	68305
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3351

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Arc A370M	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Turing
Code name	DG2-128	TU106
Launch date	30 Mar 2022	27 May 2019
Place in performance rating	336	334
Type		Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	1215 MHz
Core clock speed	1550 MHz	600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	1,050 GFLOPS (1:4)	175.0 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)	11.20 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.198 TFLOPS	5.599 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	2304
Pixel fill rate	65.60 GPixel/s	77.76 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	131.2 GTexel/s	175.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	7200 million	10800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Width		IGP
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.1
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	448 GB/s
Memory bus width	64 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6