Intel Arc A370M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Arc A370M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Arc A370M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 10 mois plus tard
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1550 MHz versus 705 MHz
- 2.3x plus de vitesse augmenté: 2050 MHz versus 876 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 131.2 GTexel/s versus 338 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 6 nm versus 28 nm
- 10.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 375 Watt
- 250x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 7.0 GB/s
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 167.171 versus 66.419
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1470.844 versus 1261.593
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.937 versus 7.89
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 71.258 versus 17.882
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 482.549 versus 309.857
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 versus 639
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 29725 versus 22732
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 Mar 2022 versus 28 May 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1550 MHz versus 705 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2050 MHz versus 876 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 131.2 GTexel/s versus 338 billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 6 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 375 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 167.171 versus 66.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1470.844 versus 1261.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.937 versus 7.89 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.258 versus 17.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 482.549 versus 309.857 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 versus 639 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29725 versus 22732 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- 5.6x plus de pipelines: 2x 2880 versus 1024
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8905 versus 5115
- 5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 versus 3443
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2x 2880 versus 1024 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8905 versus 5115 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 versus 3443 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Arc A370M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 167.171 | 66.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1470.844 | 1261.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.937 | 7.89 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.258 | 17.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 482.549 | 309.857 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 639 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5115 | 8905 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29725 | 22732 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3443 | 17055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2413 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2226 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2413 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2226 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Arc A370M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | DG2-128 | GK110B |
| Date de sortie | 30 Mar 2022 | 28 May 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 337 | 340 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
| Prix maintenant | $1,580 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 6.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2050 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1550 MHz | 705 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,050 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2x 2880 |
| Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 131.2 GTexel/s | 338 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7200 million | 7,080 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 5760 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 5,046 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.0 GB/s | 672 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Arc A370M avec des autres
IntelArc A370M vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
IntelArc A370M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970 X2
IntelArc A370M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z
IntelArc A370M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
IntelArc A370M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
IntelArc A370M vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
