Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M

  • 2.2x more core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 712 MHz
  • Around 94% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1057 MHz
  • Around 94% higher texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
  • Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 167.171 vs 165.993
  • Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 403
  • 8.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3443 vs 421
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1550 MHz vs 712 MHz
Boost clock speed 2050 MHz vs 1057 MHz
Texture fill rate 131.2 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology 6 nm vs 8 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 167.171 vs 165.993
PassMark - G2D Mark 724 vs 403
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3443 vs 421

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
  • Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1980.866 vs 1470.844
  • Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 vs 10.937
  • Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.641 vs 71.258
  • Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 745.481 vs 482.549
  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6831 vs 5115
  • Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50663 vs 29747
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 30 Mar 2022
Pipelines 2048 vs 1024
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1980.866 vs 1470.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 14.641 vs 10.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 135.641 vs 71.258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 745.481 vs 482.549
PassMark - G3D Mark 6831 vs 5115
Geekbench - OpenCL 50663 vs 29747

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
167.171
165.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1470.844
1980.866
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.937
14.641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
71.258
135.641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
482.549
745.481
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
724
403
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
5115
6831
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
29747
50663
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3443
421
Name Intel Arc A370M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 167.171 165.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1470.844 1980.866
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.937 14.641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 71.258 135.641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 482.549 745.481
PassMark - G2D Mark 724 403
PassMark - G3D Mark 5115 6831
Geekbench - OpenCL 29747 50663
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3443 421
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15760
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8923
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8045
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15760
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8923
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8045

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Arc A370M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.7 Ampere
Code name DG2-128 GA107
Launch date 30 Mar 2022 2021
Place in performance rating 333 248
Type Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2050 MHz 1057 MHz
Core clock speed 1550 MHz 712 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 6 nm 8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 1,050 GFLOPS (1:4) 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.198 TFLOPS 4.329 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 2048
Pixel fill rate 65.60 GPixel/s 42.28 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 131.2 GTexel/s 67.65 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 7200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.2
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.6 6.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.0 GB/s 192 GB/s
Memory bus width 64 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6