Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Arc A370M

NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M

Around 81% higher core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 855 MHz
Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1425 MHz
Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 167.171 vs 157.821
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.937 vs 10.833
Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 462

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1550 MHz vs 855 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz vs 1425 MHz
Texture fill rate	131.2 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm vs 12 nm
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	167.171 vs 157.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.937 vs 10.833
PassMark - G2D Mark	724 vs 462

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt
Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 1470.844
Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 vs 71.258
Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 vs 482.549
Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7853 vs 5115
Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42785 vs 28641

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	18 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1934.012 vs 1470.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	136.552 vs 71.258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	684.333 vs 482.549
PassMark - G3D Mark	7853 vs 5115
Geekbench - OpenCL	42785 vs 28641

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

167.171

157.821

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1470.844

1934.012

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.937

10.833

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

71.258

136.552

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

482.549

684.333

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

724

462

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5115

7853

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

28641

42785

Name	Intel Arc A370M	NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	167.171	157.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1470.844	1934.012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.937	10.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	71.258	136.552
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	482.549	684.333
PassMark - G2D Mark	724	462
PassMark - G3D Mark	5115	7853
Geekbench - OpenCL	28641	42785
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		9851
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		2476
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		2238
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		9851
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		2476
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		2238

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Arc A370M	NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Turing
Code name	DG2-128	TU117
Launch date	30 Mar 2022
Place in performance rating	351	353
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	1425 MHz
Core clock speed	1550 MHz	855 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	1,050 GFLOPS (1:4)	91.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)	5.837 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.198 TFLOPS	2.918 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1024
Pixel fill rate	65.60 GPixel/s	45.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	131.2 GTexel/s	91.20 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	18 Watt
Transistor count	7200 million	4700 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.1
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	160 GB/s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective	1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6