Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 930 MHz
• Around 74% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1180 MHz
• 868.9x more texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 151.0 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 618
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5115 vs 3884
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28641 vs 27798

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q

• 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	724 618
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5115 3884
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	28641 27798

Compare specifications (specs)