Intel Arc A750 vs AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 3.1x more boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 28717.9x more texture fill rate: 537.6 GTexel/s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- 9.3x more pipelines: 3584 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1800 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 304
- 13.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12373 vs 896
- 17.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98254 vs 5684
- 43.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 528.023 vs 12.111
- 25x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6333.285 vs 253.178
- 30.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 37.29 vs 1.211
- 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.823 vs 23.777
- 26.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1972.437 vs 73.506
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 vs 30 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 vs 304 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12373 vs 896 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98254 vs 5684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 vs 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 vs 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 vs 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 vs 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 vs 73.506 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A750 | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 | 304 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12373 | 896 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2612 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98254 | 5684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 | 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 | 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 | 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 | 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 | 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A750 | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | DG2-512 | Oland |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 | 30 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 78 | 1199 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 780 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2050 MHz | 730 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 268.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 21700 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |