Intel Arc A750 vs Intel HD Graphics 530

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Arc A750

Intel HD Graphics 530

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
5.9x more core clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 350 MHz
2.1x more boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1150 MHz
21333.3x more texture fill rate: 537.6 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
149.3x more pipelines: 3584 vs 24
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 14 nm
2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 254
12.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12373 vs 995
6.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2612 vs 384
22.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98254 vs 4397
17.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 528.023 vs 30.747
19.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6333.285 vs 330.464
20.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 37.29 vs 1.804
7.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.823 vs 19.781
65.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1972.437 vs 30.177

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 Oct 2022 vs 1 September 2015
Core clock speed	2050 MHz vs 350 MHz
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Texture fill rate	537.6 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	3584 vs 24
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm vs 14 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	720 vs 254
PassMark - G3D Mark	12373 vs 995
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2612 vs 384
Geekbench - OpenCL	98254 vs 4397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	528.023 vs 30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	6333.285 vs 330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	37.29 vs 1.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	140.823 vs 19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1972.437 vs 30.177

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
8x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 8 GB

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size	64 GB vs 8 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

720

254

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12373

995

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

2612

384

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

98254

4397

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

528.023

30.747

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6333.285

330.464

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

37.29

1.804

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

140.823

19.781

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1972.437

30.177

Name	Intel Arc A750	Intel HD Graphics 530
PassMark - G2D Mark	720	254
PassMark - G3D Mark	12373	995
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2612	384
Geekbench - OpenCL	98254	4397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	528.023	30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	6333.285	330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	37.29	1.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	140.823	19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1972.437	30.177
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3346

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Arc A750	Intel HD Graphics 530
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Generation 9.0
Code name	DG2-512	Skylake GT2
Launch date	12 Oct 2022	1 September 2015
Place in performance rating	78	1248
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	2050 MHz	350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	14 nm
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	17.20 TFLOPS
Pipelines	3584	24
Pixel fill rate	268.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	537.6 GTexel/s	25.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	21700 million	189 million
Floating-point performance		403.2 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Dual-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Recommended system power (PSU)	550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	64 GB
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Memory type	GDDR6	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4
Shared memory		1