Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 93% higher core clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1063 MHz
• Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1480 MHz
• 4540.5x more texture fill rate: 537.6 GTexel/s vs 118.4 GTexel / s
• 2.8x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1280
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 402
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12373 vs 7846
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98254 vs 30492
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 528.023 vs 147.271
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6333.285 vs 1681.162
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 37.29 vs 8.754
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.823 vs 98.592
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1972.437 vs 416.14

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q

• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
• 4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
• Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3316 vs 2612

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	720 402
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12373 7846
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2612 3316
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	98254 30492
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	528.023 147.271
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6333.285 1681.162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.29 8.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.823 98.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1972.437 416.14

Compare specifications (specs)