Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A50 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A50
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1607 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 2350 MHz vs 1733 MHz
- 542.4x more texture fill rate: 150.4 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 200x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s
| Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 vs 27 May 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1607 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2350 MHz vs 1733 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 150.4 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 vs 540
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15554 vs 5224
- Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55407 vs 33127
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 vs 540 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15554 vs 5224 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55407 vs 33127 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A50
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc Pro A50 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | 886 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5224 | 15554 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33127 | 55407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7546 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc Pro A50 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
| Code name | DG2-128 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 | 27 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 262 | 265 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Price now | $439.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2350 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,203 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.626 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.813 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 75.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 150.4 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7200 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 10 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Arc Pro A50 with others
IntelArc Pro A50 vs
ATIFirePro RG220
IntelArc Pro A50 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 485M
IntelArc Pro A50 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
IntelArc Pro A50 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
IntelArc Pro A50 vs
IntelArc A380
IntelArc Pro A50 vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
