Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 1967.2x more texture fill rate: 48.00 GTexel/s vs 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
- 40x more pipelines: 640 vs 2x 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 65 nm
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 20 January 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 GTexel/s vs 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 vs 2x 8 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 65 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 45 Watt
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1157 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 103 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 143 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 658 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 658 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Tesla |
Code name | Alder Lake GT1 | G98 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 20 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1456 | 1453 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $131.43 | |
Price now | $80.99 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 2x 8 |
Pixel fill rate | 24.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 GTexel/s | 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 40 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2x 22.4 gflops | |
Transistor count | 210 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 2x 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 2x 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 2x 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |