Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake) vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake) and NVIDIA GeForce 310M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 13440x more texture fill rate: 67.20 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 48x more pipelines: 768 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 10 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 67.20 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 16 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 40 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310M
- 5.1x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 45 Watt
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 310M
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake) | NVIDIA GeForce 310M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 124 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 22 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2949 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1167 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1167 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake) | NVIDIA GeForce 310M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Alder Lake GT1 | GT218 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 10 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1673 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 16 |
Pixel fill rate | 33.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 67.20 GTexel/s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 14 Watt |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 48.96 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Transistor count | 260 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 12.64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |