Intel Iris Graphics 6100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 6100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 64 Watt
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs 27 November 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 900
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 313
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1404
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1404
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4493 vs 3025
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 1139
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 1139
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 vs 900 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 vs 313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 1404 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 vs 3025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 1139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 1139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 3331 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 900 | 1749 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 313 | 368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 2663 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3025 | 4493 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1139 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1139 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 | 27 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1085 | 1003 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Price now | $144.81 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 64 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 2,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Graphics 6100 with others
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350 OEM
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
AMDRadeon R7 250
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
AMDFirePro M4150
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
AMDRadeon R7 350
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
IntelUHD Graphics P630
