Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 12 June 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 vs 389 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
- Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10245 vs 6374
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1850 vs 1716
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 1780
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 1780
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2992
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2992
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3241 vs 2792
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3241 vs 2792
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10245 vs 6374 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1850 vs 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3241 vs 2792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3241 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6374 | 10245 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 | 389 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1716 | 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 3241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 438.581 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.268 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.235 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Lexa |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 12 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 819 | 820 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 56 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |