Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Launch date 10 July 2019 vs 12 June 2017
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 65 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

  • 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz
  • 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
  • Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10216 vs 6387
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 402 vs 389
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1832 vs 1727
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 1780
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 1780
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2992
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2992
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3241 vs 2792
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3241 vs 2792
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Pipelines 512 vs 48
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 10216 vs 6387
PassMark - G2D Mark 402 vs 389
PassMark - G3D Mark 1832 vs 1727
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3709 vs 1780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3709 vs 1780
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 vs 2992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 vs 2992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3241 vs 2792
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3241 vs 2792

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6387
10216
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
389
402
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1727
1832
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1780
3709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1780
3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2992
3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2992
3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2792
3241
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2792
3241
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Geekbench - OpenCL 6387 10216
PassMark - G2D Mark 389 402
PassMark - G3D Mark 1727 1832
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1780 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1780 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2992 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2992 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2792 3241
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2792 3241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 30.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 438.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 46.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 139.235

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Essentials

Architecture Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) GCN 4.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e Lexa
Launch date 10 July 2019 12 June 2017
Place in performance rating 814 804
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $149

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 1219 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 925 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 48 512
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt
Floating-point performance 1,248 gflops
Texture fill rate 39.01 GTexel / s
Transistor count 2,200 million

Video outputs and ports

DisplayPort support
eDP 1.2 signal support Yes
HDMI
Display Connectors 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Memory type DDR3/DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory Yes
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 56 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz

Technologies

H265/HEVC Decode
Quick Sync

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None