Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 11.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 170 Watt
| Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 25 January 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10723 vs 6371
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 434 vs 390
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3059 vs 1716
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1780
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1780
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2992
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2992
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4184 vs 2792
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4184 vs 2792
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10723 vs 6371 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 vs 390 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3059 vs 1716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 2992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 2992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4184 vs 2792 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4184 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6371 | 10723 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 | 434 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1716 | 3059 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 4184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.935 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 539.966 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.841 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.308 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 389 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF114 |
| Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 25 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 818 | 815 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Price now | $138 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.88 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,263.4 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 52.7 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.3 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670MX
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K510M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon R5 235X OEM
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
NVIDIAT600
